LLM Notes: Supreme court judgment "People's Union for Democratic Rights vs. State of Bihar (1986)"

 The Supreme Court judgment in People's Union for Democratic Rights vs. State of Bihar (1986) is a landmark case addressing police violence against a peaceful gathering of poor peasants and landless people in Bihar.

Facts of the Case

• On April 19, 1986, around 600 to 700 poor peasants, mostly from backward classes, assembled peacefully for a meeting at Gandhi Library compound in Arwal, Gaya district, Bihar.

• Without any prior warning or provocation, the police, led by the Superintendent of Police, surrounded the gathering and opened fire.

• This police action resulted in at least 21 deaths, including children, and many others injured.

Legal Issue

The case was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by the People's Union for Democratic Rights, an organization committed to upholding fundamental rights, seeking justice for the victims and accountability for the police action.

Supreme Court’s Judgment

• The Court condemned the police firing on an unarmed, peaceful assembly as a gross violation of fundamental rights, particularly the right to life and liberty guaranteed under Article 21.

• It held that the state has a constitutional obligation to protect citizens' rights to assemble peacefully and to ensure that law enforcement agencies act within the bounds of law.

• The Court emphasized that the use of lethal force by police must be a last resort and proportionate to the threat posed; indiscriminate firing on peaceful protesters is unconstitutional.

• The judgment underscored the importance of safeguarding democratic rights and ensuring that state machinery does not suppress dissent through violence.

Significance

• This case reinforced the protection of civil liberties, especially the right to peaceful assembly.

• It established judicial scrutiny over police actions and state responsibility in preventing human rights violations.

• The judgment contributed to the jurisprudence on the limits of police powers and the state's duty to uphold constitutional freedoms.

In summary, the Supreme Court in People's Union for Democratic Rights vs. State of Bihar (1986) ruled against the unlawful police firing on peaceful peasants, affirming the constitutional rights to life and peaceful assembly and holding the state accountable for protecting these rights.

Print Page