LLM Notes: What are the factors which play an important role in the decision making in Indian courts?

 Several factors influence judicial decision-making in Indian courts. These factors can be broadly categorized into legal, extralegal, and systemic considerations. Below is a detailed explanation of these factors:

Legal Factors

1. Statutory Provisions: Courts primarily rely on the Constitution, statutes, and codified laws to decide cases. Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution, for example, play a crucial role in ensuring justice and fairness.

2. Doctrine of Precedents: Under Article 141 of the Indian Constitution, decisions of the Supreme Court are binding on all subordinate courts. Judicial precedents ensure consistency and predictability in legal outcomes. The principle of ratio decidendi (reason for the decision) is binding, while obiter dicta (incidental remarks) may hold persuasive value.

3. Principles of Natural Justice: Courts adhere to principles like fair hearing (audi alteram partem) and impartiality (nemo judex in causa sua) to ensure justice is not compromised.

4. Judicial Doctrines: Concepts like the Basic Structure Doctrine (Kesavananda Bharati case) and Stare Decisis guide courts in maintaining constitutional integrity and legal consistency.

Extralegal Factors

1. Judges' Personal Attributes:

   • Personality traits, temperament, and intellectual inclinations of judges can influence their rulings.

   • Judges' life experiences, professional background, and even subconscious biases may shape their decisions.

2. Political and Social Context:

   • Judicial decisions can be influenced by prevailing political ideologies or public opinion. For instance, landmark judgments like Indra Sawhney v. Union of India reflect the judiciary's engagement with social realities like affirmative action.

   • Pressure from political entities or societal expectations may also play a role in judicial behavior.

3. Cognitive Biases:

   • Judges are susceptible to biases such as hindsight bias (perceiving past events as more predictable), framing bias (influence by how information is presented), and anchoring bias (relying heavily on initial information).

Systemic Factors

1. Judicial Hierarchy:

   • Lower courts are bound by decisions of higher courts. Fear of reversal on appeal often compels judges to align their rulings with established precedents.

2. Case Load and Time Constraints:

   • Heavy caseloads and time pressures may lead judges to rely on cognitive shortcuts or heuristics in decision-making.

3. Public Accountability:

   • Judges are conscious of their accountability to the public and the need to maintain the judiciary's credibility. This awareness can influence their rulings to appear impartial or socially acceptable.

Ethical and Philosophical Considerations

1. Judicial Activism vs. Restraint:

   • Courts sometimes adopt an activist approach to fill legislative gaps or address injustices (e.g., expanding fundamental rights under Article 21). However, they also exercise restraint to respect the separation of powers.

2. Moral Values and Justice:

   • Judges often balance positivist interpretations of law with moral considerations to ensure justice is served in individual cases (e.g., curative petitions).

In summary, while legal principles form the foundation for judicial decisions, extralegal factors such as judges' personalities, political context, cognitive biases, and systemic pressures also play significant roles in shaping outcomes in Indian courts.

Summary in ten bullet points

Here are the key points summarizing the factors influencing judicial decision-making in Indian courts:

1. Statutory Provisions: Courts rely on the Constitution, statutes, and codified laws as the primary basis for decisions, ensuring compliance with legal frameworks like Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution.

2. Doctrine of Precedents: Judicial precedents under Article 141 of the Constitution ensure consistency and predictability, with ratio decidendi being binding and obiter dicta holding persuasive value.

3. Principles of Natural Justice: Courts adhere to fundamental principles like fair hearing (audi alteram partem) and impartiality (nemo judex in causa sua) to uphold fairness in judicial processes.

4. Judicial Doctrines: Doctrines such as the Basic Structure Doctrine and Stare Decisis guide courts in maintaining constitutional integrity and legal consistency.

5. Judges' Personal Attributes: Judges' temperament, intellectual inclinations, life experiences, and subconscious biases can influence their decision-making.

6. Political and Social Context: Prevailing political ideologies, public opinion, and societal expectations may shape judicial rulings, as seen in landmark cases like Indra Sawhney v. Union of India.

7. Cognitive Biases: Judges may be influenced by biases such as hindsight bias (predicting past events), framing bias (presentation of information), or anchoring bias (relying heavily on initial information).

8. Judicial Hierarchy: Lower courts are bound by higher court rulings, and fear of reversal on appeal often compels adherence to established precedents.

9. Case Load and Time Constraints: Heavy workloads and time pressures may lead judges to use cognitive shortcuts or heuristics in their decision-making process.

10. Ethical and Philosophical Considerations: Judges balance judicial activism (addressing legislative gaps) with restraint (respecting separation of powers) while considering moral values to ensure justice is served.

Print Page