LLM Notes: Nature and Scope of Judicial Process in Indian Law

 Introduction

The judicial process in India refers to the mechanism by which courts interpret, apply, and develop laws to resolve disputes and uphold justice. It is an integral part of the legal system, ensuring the rule of law, protecting individual rights, and maintaining the balance of power among various branches of government. The process is shaped by India's Constitution, statutes, precedents, and procedural laws.

Nature of Judicial Process in India

The judicial process in India is characterized by several key features:

1. Adversarial System:
   India predominantly follows the adversarial system of justice, wherein the court acts as a neutral referee between opposing parties. Each party presents its case, and the judge determines the outcome based on evidence and arguments presented. However, certain elements of the inquisitorial system have been incorporated to enhance justice delivery.

2. Binding Precedent:
   The doctrine of stare decisis plays a crucial role in Indian judicial processes. Article 141 of the Constitution mandates that Supreme Court decisions are binding on all lower courts. This ensures consistency and predictability in law.

3. Constitutional Supremacy:
   The judiciary derives its authority from the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land. Courts are tasked with interpreting constitutional provisions to safeguard fundamental rights and ensure compliance with constitutional principles.

4. Judicial Review:
   Indian courts have the power to review legislative and executive actions to ensure their constitutionality. Judicial review is considered a basic feature of India's democracy, enabling courts to nullify unconstitutional acts.

5. Three-Tier Structure:
   The judiciary operates through a hierarchical structure comprising the Supreme Court at the apex, High Courts at the state level, and subordinate courts at the district level. This structure ensures accessibility and efficiency in justice delivery.

6. Intellectual Decision-Making:
   Judicial decision-making involves intellectual reasoning to determine "what the law is" based on statutes, precedents, and constitutional principles. Judges are expected to act rationally and reasonably in their adjudication.

Scope of Judicial Process in India

The scope of judicial process in India is vast and encompasses several dimensions:

1. Interpretation of Law

• Courts interpret statutes and constitutional provisions to clarify ambiguities and address gaps in legislation.

• They also develop legal principles through judicial precedents, contributing to law-making indirectly.

2. Protection of Rights

• The judiciary plays a pivotal role in safeguarding fundamental rights enshrined in Part III of the Constitution.

• Public interest litigation (PIL) has expanded access to justice by allowing individuals or groups to approach courts for issues affecting public welfare.

3. Judicial Review

• The judiciary reviews legislative enactments and executive orders on grounds such as violation of fundamental rights, lack of competence, or repugnancy to constitutional provisions.

• This ensures checks and balances among different branches of government.

4. Criminal Justice

• In criminal trials, judges ensure procedural fairness while also assisting in truth-finding by exercising powers under provisions like Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act.

• Judges frame charges under Sections 228 and 240 of CrPC, reflecting inquisitorial elements within an adversarial framework.

5. Civil Justice

• Civil disputes are resolved through adherence to procedural laws like CPC.

• Courts scrutinize pleadings, documents, and evidence meticulously to ensure justice delivery.

6. Environmental and Social Justice

• Class action suits under environmental laws allow citizens to file complaints against violations.

• Courts have actively intervened in cases involving human rights violations, labor exploitation, and gender-based crimes.

Challenges in Judicial Process

Despite its strengths, India's judicial process faces several challenges:

• Delays: Overburdened courts lead to prolonged trials.

• Accessibility: Marginalized groups often struggle with access due to financial or procedural barriers.

• Vacancies: Judicial vacancies impact efficiency.

• Complexity: Procedural complexities can deter litigants from seeking justice.

Conclusion

The judicial process in India is a cornerstone of democracy that ensures justice delivery through interpretation, application, and development of laws. While it predominantly follows an adversarial model, it incorporates inquisitorial elements for greater fairness. By upholding constitutional principles and safeguarding rights through judicial review, India's judiciary plays a critical role in maintaining societal balance. However, addressing challenges like delays and accessibility is essential for enhancing its effectiveness further.

Print Page