The judiciary in India, particularly the Supreme Court, plays a pivotal role in fostering social change by interpreting and enforcing constitutional principles. Through landmark judgments, judicial activism, and public interest litigation (PIL), the judiciary has emerged as a powerful agent of transformation, addressing societal issues and promoting justice, equality, and human rights.
Mechanisms of Judicial Intervention
-
Judicial Activism: Indian courts have adopted an activist approach to interpret laws in a progressive manner, often stepping into areas traditionally reserved for the legislature or executive. This has allowed the judiciary to address pressing social issues like gender equality, environmental protection, and minority rights.
-
Public Interest Litigation (PIL): PILs have enabled individuals and organizations to seek justice for broader social concerns, such as environmental degradation or the rights of marginalized groups. This mechanism has democratized access to justice and empowered citizens to challenge systemic injustices.
-
Interpretation of Fundamental Rights: The judiciary has expanded the scope of constitutional rights, particularly under Articles 14 (equality), 19 (freedom), and 21 (right to life), to include modern concerns like privacy, health, education, and dignity.
Landmark Judgments Driving Social Change
The following judgments illustrate how the judiciary has acted as an instrument of social change:
Gender Justice
-
Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997): This judgment established guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at workplaces, paving the way for the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013. It underscored gender equality as intrinsic to fundamental rights.
-
Sabarimala Temple Case (2018): The Supreme Court struck down discriminatory practices that barred women of menstruating age from entering the Sabarimala temple, reinforcing gender equality.
Environmental Protection
-
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1986): The court introduced the doctrine of absolute liability for industries causing environmental harm, setting a precedent for stringent environmental regulations.
Rights of Marginalized Communities
-
Naz Foundation v. Union of India (2018): This judgment decriminalized homosexuality by reading down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, affirming equality and non-discrimination for LGBTQ+ individuals.
-
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India (2014): Recognized transgender persons as a "third gender," ensuring their fundamental rights under the Constitution.
Right to Life and Liberty
-
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978): Expanded the interpretation of Article 21 to include fairness and reasonableness in procedures depriving personal liberty.
-
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985): Declared the right to livelihood as part of the right to life under Article 21, emphasizing socio-economic justice.
Social Justice
-
Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985): Upheld maintenance rights for divorced Muslim women under Section 125 CrPC, sparking debates on gender justice within personal laws.
-
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): Established the basic structure doctrine, limiting Parliament's power to amend fundamental constitutional principles like democracy and secularism.
Challenges and Criticisms
While judicial activism has been instrumental in driving social change, it has faced criticism for overstepping its boundaries and encroaching upon legislative or executive domains. Some argue this constitutes "judicial overreach," potentially disrupting the balance between the three organs of government. Nonetheless, public trust in the judiciary remains high due to its proactive role in addressing societal issues.
Conclusion
The judicial process in India is not merely confined to resolving disputes but serves as a transformative force that shapes societal values and governance structures. Landmark judgments have not only upheld constitutional principles but also catalyzed significant social reforms in areas such as gender equality, environmental protection, minority rights, and socio-economic justice. Through its dynamic interpretation of laws and proactive stance on human rights issues, the judiciary continues to play a crucial role in advancing India's journey toward a more equitable society.
No comments:
Post a Comment