Merely for the reason that
the injuries inflicted by Accused no.2 (K.B.Vijayakumar)
were less than what was inflicted by Accused no.3
(K.B.Jayakumar @ Suresh) and the injuries were not a
grievous. Conviction under Section 326 cannot be converted
to Section 324. Irrespective of the facts whether the
injuries caused to the injured persons (PW1 & PW7) were
only on the hand, the fact remained that the presence of
Accused no.2 on the spot is as an accomplice of Accused
no.3 and hence, Section 34 of the IPC is clearly made out.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1694/2014
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs BATTEGOWDA & ORS.
Dated: January 09, 2025.
Read full Judgment here: Click here.
Print Page
No comments:
Post a Comment