The concerned Court itself came to the conclusion that police custody is not required and has dismissed the application(s) of the prosecution as well as the Complainant. We see no reason to interfere with the order of the High Court, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 18063/2024
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-12-2024
in WP No. 33526/2024 (GM-RES) passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru]
HYDER ALI Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
Date : 08-01-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Read Karanataka HC Judgment here: Click here.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the parties.
By this petition the petitioner-complainant seeks that the
accused persons (respondent nos.2 to 4 herein) be sent to police
custody. We are informed that the accused (respondent nos.2 to 4
herein) are already in judicial custody. The concerned Court itself
came to the conclusion that police custody is not required and has dismissed the application(s) of the prosecution as well as the
Complainant. We see no reason to interfere with the order of the High Court, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(NIRMALA NEGI) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR)
COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Print Page
No comments:
Post a Comment