Transformative Constitutionalism: A Catalyst for Social Change in India

 Transformative constitutionalism is an evolving concept that underscores the role of a constitution as a powerful instrument for social change, particularly in societies grappling with historical injustices and inequalities. In the context of India, this approach emphasizes not just the legalistic interpretation of constitutional provisions but also their potential to foster equality, dignity, and justice. The Indian Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in this transformative journey through various landmark judgments that reflect the principles of transformative constitutionalism.

Key Features of Transformative Constitutionalism

Transformative constitutionalism is characterized by several key features:

1. Promotion of Social Change: At its core, this concept aims to engender societal transformation by embedding values such as liberty, equality, fraternity, and dignity within the legal framework.

2. Judicial Activism: The judiciary is crucial in interpreting constitutional provisions in ways that promote these transformative ideals, often transcending mere legal formalism to address broader social issues.

3. Recognition of Historical Inequities: Transformative constitutionalism acknowledges past injustices and seeks to rectify them through affirmative action and other measures designed to achieve substantive equality.

 Landmark Supreme Court Judgments

Several significant judgments by the Indian Supreme Court illustrate the principles of transformative constitutionalism:

NALSA v. Union of India (2014)

In a groundbreaking decision, the Supreme Court recognized the rights of transgender individuals, affirming that gender identity is fundamental to an individual's dignity and self-identity. The court directed the government to take proactive measures to protect the rights of transgender persons, reinforcing the idea that the Constitution serves as a transformative document capable of addressing deep-rooted social inequalities.

 Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)

This landmark ruling decriminalized homosexuality by striking down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. The court emphasized that a transformative Constitution must protect individuals from discrimination based on sexual orientation, thereby reinforcing dignity and equality. This judgment was a significant affirmation of LGBTQ+ rights in India and highlighted the judiciary's role in promoting social justice.

 Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M. (2018)

In this case, which involved an interfaith couple facing familial opposition, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of their right to marry. The judgment underscored individual autonomy and choice in personal relationships, aligning with transformative constitutionalism's emphasis on personal freedoms as essential components of a democratic society.

 Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (Sabarimala Case) (2018)

The Supreme Court ruled that women aged 10-50 should be allowed entry into the Sabarimala temple, challenging traditional gender norms and advocating for gender equality. This decision illustrated how religious practices should not infringe upon constitutional rights, further demonstrating the judiciary's role as a catalyst for social change.

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)

This landmark ruling established the right to privacy as a fundamental right under the Constitution. The court's interpretation highlighted that privacy is essential for individual autonomy and dignity, aligning with transformative constitutionalism’s goals of protecting personal freedoms against state intrusion.

Conclusion

Transformative constitutionalism in India reflects an ongoing commitment by the judiciary to interpret constitutional provisions in ways that promote social justice and rectify historical inequalities. Through landmark judgments, the Supreme Court has actively engaged in reshaping societal norms and advancing fundamental rights, illustrating how constitutional law can serve as a powerful tool for transformation in society. As Justice D.Y. Chandrachud aptly noted, this approach ensures that "the Constitution is not merely a legal document but a living instrument that evolves with society."