Article 12 of the Indian Constitution plays a crucial role in defining the term "State" for the purposes of enforcing fundamental rights. This definition is pivotal as it determines which entities can be held accountable for violations of these rights, which are enshrined in Part III of the Constitution.
Definition of State Under Article 12
Article 12 states that:
“In this part, unless the context otherwise requires, the State includes the Government and Parliament of India and the Government and Legislature of each of the States and all local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.”
This definition encompasses:
- The Central Government and Parliament.
- The State Governments and their Legislatures.
- Local authorities (like municipal corporations) and other authorities that operate under governmental control.
The Supreme Court has interpreted "other authorities" broadly, using various judgments to clarify what constitutes a "State." For instance, in Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India, the Court established criteria such as statutory creation, public function discharge, financial autonomy, and governmental control to determine whether an entity qualifies as a State under Article 12.
Importance of Article 12
The significance of Article 12 lies in its role in safeguarding fundamental rights. It ensures that these rights can be enforced against various governmental and quasi-governmental bodies. By including local authorities and other instrumentalities within its scope, Article 12 guarantees that any violation of fundamental rights by these entities can be challenged legally.
Need for Widening Its Definition in the Wake of Liberalization
With India's economic liberalization, there has been a significant rise in private entities' power and influence. This shift raises critical questions about whether the current definition of "State" under Article 12 is adequate to protect citizens' fundamental rights against actions by private corporations or organizations that may act with state-like authority.
Arguments for Widening the Definition
- Accountability: As private entities increasingly perform functions traditionally associated with the State (like public services), there is a pressing need for accountability mechanisms to ensure they do not violate fundamental rights. Expanding the definition could help hold these entities accountable under constitutional provisions.
- Protection Against Corporate Overreach: The concentration of economic power in private hands can lead to abuses that infringe on individual rights. By including such entities within the ambit of Article 12, citizens could seek redress against corporate actions that adversely affect their rights.
- Judicial Precedents: Recent judicial interpretations have indicated a willingness to consider private bodies as "State" when they perform public functions or are significantly funded by the government. This evolving jurisprudence suggests a trend towards recognizing broader definitions.
Conclusion
Article 12 serves as a foundational element in protecting fundamental rights within India's constitutional framework. However, as economic liberalization progresses and private entities gain more influence, there is a compelling argument for reconsidering its definition. A broader interpretation could enhance accountability and protect citizens from potential abuses by powerful non-state actors. Balancing these considerations will be essential as India navigates its evolving socio-economic landscape.
Print Page
No comments:
Post a Comment