iii. While a person already in custody in connection with a particular offence apprehends arrest in a different offence, then, the subsequent offence is a separate offence for all practical purposes. This would necessarily imply that all rights conferred by the statute on the accused as well as the investigating agency in relation to the subsequent offence are independently protected.
iv. The investigating agency, if it deems necessary for the purpose of interrogation/investigation in an offence, can seek remand of the accused whilst he is in custody in connection with a previous
offence so long as no order granting anticipatory bail has been
passed in relation to the subsequent offence. However, if an order
granting anticipatory bail in relation to the subsequent offence is
obtained by the accused, it shall no longer be open to the
investigating agency to seek remand of the accused in relation to
the subsequent offence. Similarly, if an order of police remand is
passed before the accused is able to obtain anticipatory bail, it
would thereafter not be open to the accused to seek anticipatory
bail and the only option available to him would be to seek regular bail.
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2501 OF 2024
DHANRAJ ASWANI Vs AMAR S. MULCHANDANI & ANR.
Author: J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
Citation: 2024 INSC 669.
Dated: 9 th September, 2024.
Read full Judgment here: Click here.
Print Page
No comments:
Post a Comment