What is difference between concept of secularism in India and in western countries?

The concept of secularism varies significantly between India and Western countries due to differences in historical contexts, cultural diversity, and constitutional frameworks. Here's a comparative overview:

1. Historical Context

• Western Secularism:
  • Rooted in the European Enlightenment and the separation of church and state.
  • Historically, it emerged as a response to religious conflicts and the dominance of the Church in political affairs.
  • Secularism in Western countries often emphasizes the neutrality of the state in religious matters, ensuring that religion does not influence government policies and vice versa.
• Indian Secularism:
  • Developed in a context of immense religious diversity and historical coexistence of multiple religions.
  • Influenced by the colonial experience, where religion was often a tool of division and control by the British.
  • Indian secularism emphasizes equal respect for all religions rather than strict separation. The state is expected to be neutral but also actively support and protect all religions.

2. Constitutional Framework

• Western Secularism:

  • Typically involves a clear separation between religion and the state. For example, in the United States, the First Amendment of the Constitution prohibits the establishment of religion and ensures the free exercise of religion.
  • The state does not fund religious institutions, nor does it promote religious practices in public institutions like schools.
  • Religion is often seen as a private matter, separate from public life.

• Indian Secularism:

  • Enshrined in the Indian Constitution, where the state is expected to treat all religions equally.
  • The state can and does engage with religious institutions, providing subsidies, managing religious sites, and allowing religious laws to govern certain aspects of personal life (like marriage and inheritance).
  • India’s secularism is more about religious pluralism and coexistence rather than separation. The state does not prioritize any religion but also does not withdraw from religious affairs.

3. State and Religion Interaction

• Western Secularism:

  • The state typically maintains a distance from religious institutions.
  • Public policies are generally formulated without reference to religious doctrines.
  • In countries like France (with laïcité), even public expressions of religion can be restricted to maintain the secular nature of public spaces.

• Indian Secularism:

  • The state engages with religious institutions and can intervene in religious matters to ensure social justice (e.g., banning untouchability, reforming personal laws).
  • Religious festivals are often recognized and celebrated by the state.
  • The Indian state might fund religious schools and provide scholarships to students of different religions.

4. Public Life and Religion

• Western Secularism:

  • Religion is largely seen as a personal matter, with public life being secular in nature.
  • Religious symbols and practices are usually kept out of public institutions.

• Indian Secularism:

  • Religion plays a significant role in public life, with religious symbols and practices visible in public spaces.
  • The state actively engages in religious activities, including organizing and supporting religious events.

Summary:

• Western Secularism: Emphasizes a strict separation between religion and state, treating religion as a private matter.
• Indian Secularism: Focuses on equal respect and treatment of all religions by the state, allowing for a more integrated relationship between religion and public life, while ensuring that no religion dominates the state.

This distinction reflects the different challenges and historical contexts that have shaped secularism in these regions.

Print Page