What are differences in approaches under MCOCA and Organized Crime under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?

 The Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOCA) and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) both aim to address organized crime in India, but they differ significantly in their approaches, definitions, and procedural frameworks. Here’s a detailed comparison of their key aspects:

 Definitions and Scope

MCOCA

- Definition of Organized Crime: MCOCA defines organized crime as any continuing unlawful activity conducted by individuals as part of an organized crime syndicate, which involves violence, intimidation, or coercion for financial gain or other advantages. It emphasizes the need for a syndicate of two or more persons engaged in such activities.

  

- Specificity: While MCOCA outlines a broad definition of organized crime, it has been criticized for its vague terms, allowing for its application in various cases, including those already covered under other laws.

BNS

- Definition of Organized Crime: The BNS also defines organized crime as continuing unlawful activity but explicitly lists various types of crimes such as kidnapping, extortion, cybercrime, and human trafficking. This specificity aims to clarify the types of organized crimes that are prosecutable under the law.

- Inclusion of Petty Organized Crime: The BNS introduces the concept of petty organized crime, which includes less severe offenses that still create a sense of insecurity among the public, thereby broadening the scope of what constitutes organized crime.

 Legal Framework and Procedures

MCOCA

- Special Courts: MCOCA establishes special courts specifically for the trial of organized crime cases, allowing for expedited procedures. This includes provisions for preventive detention and special rules of evidence, which can expedite the legal process but may raise concerns about civil liberties.

Preventive Measures: MCOCA allows for preventive detention based on the suspicion of involvement in organized crime, which can lead to extended periods of custody without formal charges.

BNS

- Regular Courts: The BNS proposes that organized crime cases be tried in regular sessions courts rather than special courts, which may lead to longer trial durations and procedural complexities.

- Enhanced Penalties: The BNS stipulates harsher penalties for organized crime, including the death penalty or life imprisonment for offenses resulting in death, with fines significantly higher than those under MCOCA. For example, the BNS imposes a minimum fine of ₹10 lakh for such offenses, compared to MCOCA's ₹1 lakh minimum.

Focus and Objectives

MCOCA- Targeted Approach: MCOCA was designed specifically for Maharashtra to tackle organized crime in urban areas, reflecting the state's unique challenges with gang violence and organized criminal networks. Its provisions are tailored to address the complexities of organized crime prevalent in the region.

BNS

-National Framework: The BNS aims to provide a comprehensive national framework to combat organized crime, reflecting the need for a uniform approach across India. It addresses organized crime's inter-state and international ramifications, which were not fully covered under MCOCA.

-Victim-Centric: The BNS emphasizes victim protection and rehabilitation, which is a significant shift from the more punitive focus of MCOCA.

Conclusion

In summary, while both MCOCA and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita aim to combat organized crime, they differ in their definitions, procedural frameworks, and overall objectives. MCOCA is a state-specific law with a focus on expedited trials and preventive measures, whereas the BNS provides a broader, national approach with detailed definitions and a victim-centric focus. 

Print Page