How rule of Audi alteram partem is applicable to criminal trial as per indian law?

 The principle of "Audi alteram partem," which means "hear the other side," is a fundamental aspect of natural justice and is crucial to the fairness and impartiality of legal proceedings, including criminal trials. In the context of Indian law, this rule is ingrained in various constitutional and statutory provisions that ensure a fair trial. Here's how it applies to criminal trials in India:

1. Right to be Heard:

   • The Indian Constitution guarantees the right to a fair trial under Article 21, which includes the right to be heard. This right is an essential element of natural justice.
   • During a criminal trial, the accused has the right to be present in court, to hear the evidence against them, and to present their defense.

2. Right to Notice:

   • The principle of Audi alteram partem requires that the accused must be informed of the charges against them in a clear and specific manner. This is typically achieved through the issuance of a charge sheet.
   • The Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) mandates that the accused be given a copy of the charge sheet and other relevant documents to prepare their defense adequately.

3. Opportunity to Defend:

   • The accused must be given an adequate opportunity to present their case, which includes the right to cross-examine prosecution witnesses and to produce evidence and witnesses in their defense.
   • Section 313 of the CrPC specifically provides the accused with an opportunity to explain any circumstances appearing in the evidence against them.

4. Legal Representation:

   • Under Article 22(1) of the Indian Constitution and Section 303 of the CrPC, the accused has the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of their choice.
   • If the accused cannot afford legal representation, the state is required to provide legal aid, ensuring that the right to a fair hearing is not compromised due to financial constraints.

5. Impartial and Independent Judiciary:

   • The judiciary must remain impartial and free from bias. The rule of Audi alteram partem ensures that the judge hears both sides of the case before making a decision.
   • Judges must provide reasoned judgments, demonstrating that they have considered the arguments and evidence from both the prosecution and the defense.

6. Ex Parte Decisions:

   • Any decision taken without hearing the accused is generally considered invalid, barring certain exceptional circumstances where immediate action is necessary to prevent justice from being thwarted.

7. Bail Hearings:

   • During bail hearings, the accused has the right to be heard and to present arguments as to why bail should be granted. The prosecution also has the opportunity to present reasons for opposing bail.

8. Appeal and Revision:

   • The principle extends to appellate proceedings as well, where the accused has the right to be heard during appeals or revisions of their case.
   • Higher courts reviewing a case must ensure that the lower courts have adhered to the principles of natural justice, including Audi alteram partem.

In summary, the rule of Audi alteram partem is deeply embedded in the criminal justice system of India. It ensures that no person is condemned unheard and that the principles of fairness and justice are upheld throughout the judicial process.

Print Page