The question which arises for consideration in this appeal is
as to whether a witness which has been shown in the
prosecution list but not examined on behalf of the
prosecution, can be permitted to be examined as a defence
witness. {Para 2}
3. In our considered view, both the Courts are wrong in declining
the request of the appellant, as factually, the witness sought
to be examined on the side of the defence has not been
examined by the prosecution. In other words, the prosecution
has consequentially chosen to discharge the said witness and,
therefore, he has not been put in the witness box to depose on
behalf of the prosecution.
4. In such view of the matter, there is no bar in the law for
examining the said witness as defence witness.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2024 (@ SLP(CRL.) No.10756/2023)
SUNDER LAL Vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
1. Leave granted.
2. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal is
as to whether a witness which has been shown in the
prosecution list but not examined on behalf of the
prosecution, can be permitted to be examined as a defence
witness.
3. In our considered view, both the Courts are wrong in declining
the request of the appellant, as factually, the witness sought
to be examined on the side of the defence has not been
examined by the prosecution. In other words, the prosecution
has consequentially chosen to discharge the said witness and,
therefore, he has not been put in the witness box to depose on
behalf of the prosecution.
4. In such view of the matter, there is no bar in the law for
examining the said witness as defence witness. After all, it
is for the Trial Court to consider the evidentiary value of
the said witness while coming to its conclusion.
5. Accordingly, the impugned order passed by the High Court
confirming the order passed by the Trial Court stands set
aside.
6. Consequently, the appeal stands allowed. The appellant is
permitted to examine the prosecution witness as defence
witness. Needless to state that it is well open to the
prosecution to cross-examine the said witness.
7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
……………………………………………………J.
[M.M. SUNDRESH]
……………………………………………………J.
[S.V.N. BHATTI]
NEW DELHI;
2nd FEBRUARY, 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment