Thursday, 25 April 2024

Important Supreme court and bombay HC judgments on statement of accused U/S 313 of CRPC

 

1) Supreme Court : The court must consider any alternate version of events or interpretation of incident stated by accused in her statement U/S 313 of CRPC.

REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 283 of 2011

Parminder Kaur @ P.P. Kaur @ Soni Vs State of Punjab 

Author :SURYA KANT, J.
Dated: 28.07.2020.
Citation: 2020(8) SCC 811.

2) Bombay HC: The court should not put to accused U/S 313 of CRPC, material appearing in the cross-examination of prosecution witnesses taken by Advocate for accused


 In the High Court of Bombay

(Before S.B. Shukre, J.)

Urvashi Vs State of Maharashtra 

Criminal Writ Petition No. 166 of 2016

Decided on June 20, 2016

Citation: 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 5379 : (2016) 3 AIR Bom R (Cri) (NOC 47) 15 : (2016) 3 Bom CR (Cri) 422.

https://www.lawweb.in/2024/04/bombay-hc-court-should-not-put-to.html


3) Supreme Court: Accused has to be given warning/ notice as per sub-sections 3 and 4 of S 313 of CRPC before putting incriminating circumstances against him


In the High Court of Bombay

(Before A.S. Oka and Shrihari P. Davare, JJ.)

Laxman alias Laxmayya Gangaram Zinna and Another 

Versus

State of Maharashtra 

Criminal Appeal No. 479 of 1992

Decided on May 9, 2012.

Citation: 2012 SCC OnLine Bom 723 : (2012) 4 AIR Bom R 1 : 2012 Cri LJ 2826 : (2012) 3 Bom CR (Cri) 1


4) Supreme Court: Conviction of accused will be vitiated if the court fails to consider and either accept or refuse defence of accused taken U/S 313 of CRPC by giving reasons in writing


  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Criminal Appeal No. 1330 of 2018.

Decided On: 31.10.2018

Reena Hazarika Vs. State of Assam

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:

Rohinton Fali Nariman and Navin Sinha, JJ.

Author: Navin Sinha, J.

Citation:  MANU/SC/1249/2018,(2019) 13 SCC 289.

https://www.lawweb.in/2024/04/supreme-court-conviction-of-accused.html

5) Supreme Court: The court must consider written statement filed by accused U/S 313 of CRPC in the light of prosecution evidence


 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Criminal Appeal No. 211 of 2023

Decided On: 03.03.2023

Premchand  Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:

S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, JJ.

Author: Dipankar Datta, J.

Citation: MANU/SC/0209/2023,(2023) 5 SCC 522.

https://www.lawweb.in/2024/04/supreme-court-court-must-consider.html

6) Under which circumstances the court should put questions to accused in his statement U/S 313 of CRPC regarding contents to proved documents?


 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.805 OF 2018

Nasib Osman Pathan, Vs The State of Maharashtra

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI &

ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ.

PRONOUNCED ON : 19th DECEMBER, 2023

 ( PER : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.)

https://www.lawweb.in/2023/12/under-which-circumstances-court-should.html


7) Supreme Court summarizes 10 Important principles regarding statement of accused U/S 313 of CRPC


 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Criminal Appeal No. 211 of 2023

Decided On: 03.03.2023

Premchand  Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:

S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, JJ.

Author: Dipankar Datta, J.

Citation: MANU/SC/0209/2023,(2023) 5 SCC 522.

https://www.lawweb.in/2023/06/supreme-court-summarizes-10-important.html

8) Should the court provide copies of questions to be put to accused U/S 313 of CRPC to the public prosecutor and defence counsel and seek their assistance?


 REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1471 of 2023

Raj Kumar @ Suman    Vs State (NCT of Delhi).

(Before Abhay S. Oka and Rajesh Bindal, JJ.)

Author: Abhay S. Oka, J.

Dated: May 11, 2023.

Citation: 2023 SCC OnLine SC 609.

https://www.lawweb.in/2023/05/should-court-provide-copies-of.html

9) Whether court can convict accused based on his explanation in statement U/S 313 of CRPC?

 The inconsistency and discrepancy in the evidence of the

prosecution witnesses casts a serious doubt on the prosecution

case. The prosecution having failed to establish the guilt of

the accused persons beyond reasonable doubt, the conviction

cannot be based solely on the explanation given by the

accused No.1 in his statement under Section 313 of the

Criminal Procedure Code. {Para 16}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1060 OF 2019

 Jabbar Isak Shaikh Vs  V/s.  The State of Maharashtra 

CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATE : 6th DECEMBER, 2021.

https://www.lawweb.in/2021/12/whether-court-can-convict-accused-based_19.html

10)Supreme court: Procedure to be followed by Criminal court if accused is unable to remain present before the court for recording his statement U/S 313 of CRPC in warrant or session trial

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Criminal Appeal No. 869 of 2000

Decided On: 11.10.2000

 Basavaraj R. Patil   Vs.   State of Karnataka 

Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
K.T. Thomas, R.P. Sethi and S.N. Variava, JJ.

Citation: MANU/SC/0632/2000: AIR 2000 SC 3214.

Print Page

No comments:

Post a Comment