1) Whether civil suit is maintainable to challenge assessment and levy of property tax on immovable property?
10. A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Sobha Singh & sons (P) Ltd. vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee [34 (1988) Delhi Law Times 91] had an occasion to consider the question of maintainability of a civil suit challenging the assessment and levy of property tax by the NDMC. Sections 84 and 86 of the Act came in for consideration. It was held that the provision of appeal contained in Section 84(1) of the Act provided a complete remedy to a party aggrieved against the assessment and levy of tax. Section 86 provides that the remedy of appeal is the only remedy to a party to challenge assessment for purposes of property tax. No other remedy was available to a party in such circumstances. It follows that the remedy of civil suit is barred.
11. In view of the aforesaid position in law, we are of the considered view that the civil suit filed by respondent challenging the assessment and demand of property tax by the appellant was clearly barred.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Brijesh Kumar J.Arun Kumar J.
N.D.M.C. Vs. Satish Chand(deceased by LR Ram Chand
Appeal (Civil) 2700 of 1997
11th September 2003
Citation: 2003 ALL SCR 313,2003(4) Maharashtra Law Reporter 331.
https://www.lawweb.in/2021/11/whether-civil-suit-is-maintainable-to.html
2) Whether Educational institution running on commercial lines are entitled to exemption from payment of general tax?
SUPREME COURT
S. MOHAN AND G.N. RAY, JJ.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Children Book Trust
Civil Appeal No. 2805 and Civil Appeal No. 228 1990 of 1980
21st April, 1992
Citation: 1992 ALLMR ONLINE 386 (S.C.),(1992)3SCC 390.
https://www.lawweb.in/2021/11/whether-educational-
3) Whether burden of proof is on assessee to prove that his case comes within the parameters of the exemption clause?
66.1. Exemption notification should be interpreted strictly; the burden of proving applicability would be on the assessee to show that his case comes within the parameters of the exemption clause or exemption notification.
66.2. When there is ambiguity in exemption notification which is subject to strict interpretation, the benefit of such ambiguity cannot be claimed by the subject/assessee and it must be interpreted in favour of the Revenue.
Citation: (2018) 9 SCC 1.
https://www.lawweb.in/2021/10/whether-burden-of-proof-is-on-assessee.html
4) Whether levy of property tax can be challenged U/S 406 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act?
We do not agree with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that the remedy under section 406 of the Act is not an efficacious remedy.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1650 OF 2014
Viom Infra Networks Maharashtra Ltd. & Anr Vs Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Ors.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATED : 20TH JANUARY, 2015.
https://www.lawweb.in/2022/08/whether-levy-of-property-tax-can-be.html
5) Whether the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain a challenge to property tax imposed on charitable trust?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (NAGPUR BENCH)
Appeal Against Order (AO) No. 34 of 2017
Decided On: 14.02.2018
Akola Municipal Corporation Vs. Shri Akola Gujrati Samaj
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
Manish Pitale, J.
Citation: MANU/MH/0239/2018.
https://www.lawweb.in/2022/08/whether-civil-court-has-jurisdiction-to.html
5) Should the court summarily dismiss Municipal Appeal if the appellant fails to deposit property tax during the pendency of Municipal Appeal?
Therefore, payment of the amount of tax till the date of institution and filing of the appeal and the taxes which are due and payable during the pendency of the appeal have to be secured or else, the Corporation stands to lose by way of property tax, merely because legal proceedings are pending challenging the valuation and the assessment of the same. That would not be in public interest and that is how sub-section 5 of section 217 came to be inserted.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Dena Bank & Anr. Vs. Municipal Corporation Of Gr. Mumbai & Anr.
Writ Petition No.6816 of 2010
21st July, 2011
Citation: 2011(6) ALL MR 508.
https://www.lawweb.in/2021/10/should-court-summarily-dismiss.html
Q 6:- If a person fails to pays property tax for five years. Whether municipal corporation can carry forward said tax and claim property tax for six years from said person?
Ans:- [150A of MMC Act:- Power to assess in case of escape from assessment. - Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Act or the rules made thereunder, if for any reason any person liable to pay any of the taxes or fees leviable under this Act has escaped assessment in any year, the Commissioner may, at any time within six years from the date on which such person should have been assessed, serve on such person a notice assessing him to the tax or fee due and demanding payment thereon within 15 days from the date of such service, and the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder shall, so far as may be, apply as if assessment was made in the year to which the tax or fee relates.]
7) Can the court permit the charitable trust to produce documents relating to charitable work for claiming exemption from property tax in temporary injunction application?
The petitioner could have been directed to place on record
its constitution and/or bye-laws to ascertain the object
of the trust and whether the activity is carried out for
advancement of charitable causes exclusively. It would,
therefore, be appropriate to remit the matter back to the
trial Court to decide the application for temporary
injunction afresh in the light of the aforesaid
observations.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8043 OF 2020
Abhinav Manav Vikas Sanstha Vs The State of Maharashtra
CORAM : N.J.JAMADAR,J.
PRONOUNCED ON : 30.04.2021.
https://www.lawweb.in/2021/07/can-court-permit-charitable-trust-to.html
No comments:
Post a Comment