We may note here that as far as complaints under
Section 138 of the NI Act are concerned, this Court in
Suo Motu Writ Petition (Criminal)No.2 of 2020 in the case
of "In Re : Expeditious Trial of Cases Under Section 138
of N.I.Act, 18811" has laid down the guidelines. In
clause (3) of paragraph 24 of the said decision, the
Constitution Bench has directed as under:
"3) For the conduct of inquiry under Section
202 of the Code, evidence of witnesses on behalf
of the complainant shall be permitted to be
taken on affidavit. In suitable cases, the
Magistrate can restrict the inquiry to
examination of documents without insisting for
examination of witnesses."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2484 OF 2023
VISHWAKALYAN MULTISTATE CREDIT CO OP
SOCIETY LTD. VS. ONEUP ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED.
Dated: August 21, 2023.
Leave granted.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
appellant. Despite service, no one has entered
appearance on behalf of the respondent.
The appellant is the complainant in a complaint
filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments
Act, 1881 (for short "the NI Act"). On 26th June, 2021,
the Judicial Magistrate issued process on the complaint.
By the impugned judgment, the High Court has held that as
the respondent was having its office outside the
jurisdiction of the Court of the learned Magistrate, it
was necessary for the learned Magistrate to hold an
inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (for short "the CRPC"). In paragraph 15
of the impugned judgment, the High Court held that for
non-compliance with the mandate of Section 202 of the
CRPC, the order issuing process is illegal. Therefore,
the High Court has proceeded to set aside the order
issuing process. However, no further direction was
issued by the High Court to the learned Judicial
Magistrate to hold an inquiry under Section 202 of the
CRPC.
We may note here that as far as complaints under
Section 138 of the NI Act are concerned, this Court in
Suo Motu Writ Petition (Criminal)No.2 of 2020 in the case
of "In Re : Expeditious Trial of Cases Under Section 138
of N.I.Act, 18811" has laid down the guidelines. In
clause (3) of paragraph 24 of the said decision, the
Constitution Bench has directed as under:
"3) For the conduct of inquiry under Section
202 of the Code, evidence of witnesses on behalf
of the complainant shall be permitted to be
taken on affidavit. In suitable cases, the
Magistrate can restrict the inquiry to
examination of documents without insisting for
examination of witnesses."
We, therefore, modify the impugned judgment and
direct the Trial Court to proceed from the stage of
Section 202 of the CRPC. While doing so, the learned
Magistrate will be guided by the direction issued by the
Constitution Bench which is reproduced above.
1. 2021 SCC OnLine SC 325.
With the above modification, the appeal is partly
allowed.
The inquiry under Section 202 of the CRPC shall be
conducted as expeditiously as possible and in any event
within a period of one month from the date on which a
copy of the order is received by the Trial Court.
..........................J.
(ABHAY S.OKA)
..........................J.
(PANKAJ MITHAL)
NEW DELHI;
August 21, 2023.
No comments:
Post a Comment