Learned counsel for the appellant has relied on a judgment
of a Co-ordinate Bench delivered in Criminal Appeal No. 1193 of
2023 (Makhijani Pushpak Harish Vs.The State of Gujarat) in which
such a pre-condition of furnishing Bank Guarantee was held to be unsustainable. In that judgment, reference was made to an
earlier decision of this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 186/2023
(Subhash Chouhan Vs. Union of India) delivered on 20.01.2023.
In the light of the legal position explained in the aforesaid
judgment of the co-ordinate Bench, we direct that the appellant
shall not be required to comply with condition (1) contained in
the orders of the High Court dated 22.03.2023 and 28.03.2023.
Instead of the requirement of furnishing Bank Guarantee, we
direct that the appellant shall furnish a bail bond for Rs. five
lakhs in each of the two orders for bail, under appeal before
us. Rest of the conditions contained in the orders impugned
shall remain and would have to be complied with by the appellant for being enlarged on bail.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1711-1712 OF 2023
KARANDEEP SINGH Vs CBI
Dated: JUNE 09, 2023.
Leave granted.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned
Additional Solicitor General appearing for the CBI in both the
appeals.
The appellant in these proceedings assails a part of the
order, comprising of conditions granting him bail. One of the
conditions imposed by the High Court is to the effect that the
appellant is required to furnish a Bank Guarantee to the tune of
Rs. two crores for being enlarged on bail. Both the orders
under appeal carry identical condition. There are certain other
conditions specified in the impugned order passed on 22nd March,
2023 and 28th March, 2023 but the appellant has made out no
grievance as regards those conditions. The appellant’s argument
is that such a condition is onerous.
Learned counsel for the appellant has relied on a judgment
of a Co-ordinate Bench delivered in Criminal Appeal No. 1193 of
2023 (Makhijani Pushpak Harish Vs.The State of Gujarat) in which
such a pre-condition of furnishing Bank Guarantee was held to be
unsustainable. In that judgment, reference was made to an
earlier decision of this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 186/2023
(Subhash Chouhan Vs. Union of India) delivered on 20.01.2023.
In the light of the legal position explained in the aforesaid
judgment of the co-ordinate Bench, we direct that the appellant
shall not be required to comply with condition (1) contained in
the orders of the High Court dated 22.03.2023 and 28.03.2023.
Instead of the requirement of furnishing Bank Guarantee, we
direct that the appellant shall furnish a bail bond for Rs. five
lakhs in each of the two orders for bail, under appeal before
us. Rest of the conditions contained in the orders impugned
shall remain and would have to be complied with by the appellant
for being enlarged on bail. The impugned orders dated
22.03.2023 and 28.03.2023 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application
Nos. 12980 of 2023 and 12562 of 2023 are modified to the above
extent.
The appeals stand disposed of in the above terms.
All connected applications shall also stand disposed of.
………………………………………………………………J.
[ANIRUDDHA BOSE]
…….……………………………………………….J.
[RAJESH BINDAL]
NEW DELHI;
JUNE 09, 2023
No comments:
Post a Comment