On a reading of Section 457 Cr.P.C, we find that the said provision coverers a wide spectrum and would apply to all kinds of seizures under the Cr.P.C. On a reading of the words “and such property is not produced before a Criminal Court during an inquiry or trial” appearing in Section 457 Cr.P.C, the same does not necessarily mean that the report of the seizure of property to a Magistrate would be given to the same Magistrate who would hold an inquiry of the case under Section 2(g) of the Code and the trial of the case. The report of the seizure of property could be to a different Magistrate than the one who would conduct the inquiry or trial. The report of the seizure of property under Section 457 Cr.P.C which has not been produced at the stage of investigation, could be to a Magistrate who may not have the jurisdiction to hold the inquiry or trial on the submission of the charge-sheet in the said case. As such, we are of the view that the power conferred under Section 457 Cr.P.C cannot be given a restrictive meaning, as the power under the said provision can be exercised by a Magistrate who has no power to hold an inquiry or trial of the case, in which the seized property is involved in. {Para 43}
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Crl.Pet 284/2022
The State of Assam and Another. Vs Ram Sankar Maurya.
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Author: (M. Zothankhuma, J)
Date of judgment : 02.03.2023.
Read full Judgment here: Click here
Print Page
No comments:
Post a Comment