Though, such contention is put forth by the respondents, keeping in view the provisions as contained in Order 41 Rule 5 of CPC, unless the appeal is listed and there is an interim order, the mere filing of the appeal would not operate as a stay. If that be so, the judgment and decree dated 25.08.2021 would enure to the benefit of the petitioner as on today and the rejection of the NOC only on the ground that the appeal has been filed, would not be justified. In that view, the High Court was also not justified in rejecting the petition.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19038/2022
SANJIV KUMAR SINGH Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Coram: A.S. BOPANNA; J., HIMA KOHLI; J.
Dated: 24-01-2023
Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner as also the learned counsel
for the respondents and perused the petition papers.
The petitioner is assailing the order dated 18.08.2022 passed by the High Court
of Judicature at Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11593 of 2022.
In a matter where the petitioner was before the High Court seeking a direction
to the respondent no.2/ District Magistrate, East-Champaran, Motihari, Bihar to grant
‘No Objection Certificate’ ( NOC) for starting MS/HSD retail outlet dealership over land
situated in Khata No.544, Plot No.1077, Thana No. 196, Tauzi No. 951 , Ward No.37
in Mauza Chhota Bariyarpur, Police Station Chhatauni, Motihar, District-East
Champaran, Bihar, the District Magistrate had rejected the request of the petitioner
for issue of NOC. The said order being assailed before the High Court, the High Court
has also dismissed the petition only on the ground that the respondents herein had
contended that as against the decree passed in favour of the petitioner in respect of
the said judgment and decree dated 25.08.2021, an appeal has been filed before the
High Court and the same is yet to come up for hearing. From the documents produced
along with the counter affidavit, the respondents have produced the extract of the
present case status of FA-16/2022. It is pointed out that the appeal is filed on
11.03.2022 which was registered on 15.03.2022 and the scrutiny for posting the
appeal before the Court is yet to be completed.
Though, such contention is put forth by the respondents, keeping in view the provisions as contained in Order 41 Rule 5 of CPC, unless the appeal is listed and there is an interim order, the mere filing of the appeal would not operate as a stay. If that be so, the judgment and decree dated 25.08.2021 would enure to the benefit of the petitioner as on today and the rejection of the NOC only on the ground that the appeal has been filed, would not be justified. In that view, the High Court was also not justified in rejecting the petition.
Accordingly, the Order dated 18.08.2022 passed by the High Court of Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11593 of 2022 is set aside. Consequently, the rejection of the NOC by the District Magistrate is held unjustified and the District Magistrate is directed to take note of the decree passed on 25.08.2022 and issue the NOC within a period of two weeks from this day to the petitioner, which shall however, remain subject to the result of the appeal pending before the High Court.
Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of
Print Page
If there is any indefinite interim order of stay by High court, how long that would be is valid ?
ReplyDelete