A reading of the definition of the words ‘complaint’, ‘complainant’
and ‘consumer’ makes it clear that a Trust cannot invoke the provisions of
the Act in respect of any allegation on the basis of which a complaint could
be made. To put this beyond any doubt, the word ‘person’ has also been
defined in the Act and Section 2(m) thereof defines a person as follows :-
(m) "person" includes, −
(i) a firm whether registered or not;
(ii) a Hindu undivided family;
(iii) a co-operative society;
(iv) every other association of persons whether registered under the
Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or not
5. On a plain and simple reading of all the above provisions of the Act it
is clear that a Trust is not a person and therefore not a consumer.
Consequently, it cannot be a complainant and cannot file a consumer
dispute under the provisions of the Act.
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3560 OF 2008
Pratibha Pratisthan & Ors.
vs.
Manager, Canara Bank & Ors.
Dated:March 7, 2017.
Citation: AIR 2017 SC 1303,(2017) 3 SCC 712
1. In these appeals a very short question has arisen, namely, whether a
complaint can be filed by a Trust under the provisions of the Consumer
Protection Act, 1986 (for short, ‘the Act’). The National Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, ‘National Commission’)
answered the question in the negative and we are in agreement with that
view.
2. Section 2 (c) of the Act provides for a complainant making a
complaint, inter alia, for an unfair trade practice or a restrictive trade
practice adopted by any trader or service provider; a complaint in respect of
goods (bought by a complainant) suffering from one or more defects; a
complaint of deficiency in services hired or availed of by a complainant and
so on. A complainant is defined in Section 2 (b) of the Act in the following
words :-
(b) "complainant" means −
(i) a consumer; or
(ii) any voluntary consumer association registered under the
Companies Act,1956 (1 of 1956) or under any other law for the
time being in force; or
(iii) the Central Government or any State Government; or
(iv) one or more consumers, where there are numerous consumers
having the same interest;
(v) in case of death of a consumer, his legal heir or representative ;
who or which makes a complaint;
3. It is quite clear from the above definition of a complainant that it
does not include a Trust. But does a Trust come within the definition of a
consumer?
A consumer has been defined in Section 2 (d) of the Act as follows :-
(d) "consumer" means any person who, −
(i) buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid or
promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of
deferred payment and includes any user of such goods other than the
person who buys such goods for consideration paid or promised or
partly paid or partly promised, or under any system of deferred
payment, when such use is made with the approval of such person,
but does not include a person who obtains such goods for resale or
for any commercial purpose; or
(ii) hires or avails of any services for a consideration which has been
paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any
system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such
services other than the person who hires or avails of the services for
consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or
under any system of deferred payment, when such services are
availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person; but does
not include a person who avails of such services of any commercial
purpose;
Explanation. − For the purposes of this clause, "commercial
purpose" does not include use by a person of goods bought and used
by him and services availed by him exclusively for the purposes of
earning his livelihood by means of self-employment;
4. A reading of the definition of the words ‘complaint’, ‘complainant’
and ‘consumer’ makes it clear that a Trust cannot invoke the provisions of
the Act in respect of any allegation on the basis of which a complaint could
be made. To put this beyond any doubt, the word ‘person’ has also been
defined in the Act and Section 2(m) thereof defines a person as follows :-
(m) "person" includes, −
(i) a firm whether registered or not;
(ii) a Hindu undivided family;
(iii) a co-operative society;
(iv) every other association of persons whether registered under the
Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or not
5. On a plain and simple reading of all the above provisions of the Act it
is clear that a Trust is not a person and therefore not a consumer.
Consequently, it cannot be a complainant and cannot file a consumer
dispute under the provisions of the Act.
6. In view of the above, we are of opinion that the National
Commission was quite right in holding that the complaint filed by the
appellant Trust was not maintainable.
7. We have heard submissions of learned counsel for the parties on the
merits of the dispute. However, since we have concluded that the complaint
itself was not maintainable, we refrain from making any comment on the
merits of the dispute.
8. The appeals are dismissed.
..……………………….J
(Madan B. Lokur)
New Delhi; .………………………J
March 7, 2017 (Prafulla C. Pant)
Print Page
and ‘consumer’ makes it clear that a Trust cannot invoke the provisions of
the Act in respect of any allegation on the basis of which a complaint could
be made. To put this beyond any doubt, the word ‘person’ has also been
defined in the Act and Section 2(m) thereof defines a person as follows :-
(m) "person" includes, −
(i) a firm whether registered or not;
(ii) a Hindu undivided family;
(iii) a co-operative society;
(iv) every other association of persons whether registered under the
Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or not
5. On a plain and simple reading of all the above provisions of the Act it
is clear that a Trust is not a person and therefore not a consumer.
Consequently, it cannot be a complainant and cannot file a consumer
dispute under the provisions of the Act.
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3560 OF 2008
Pratibha Pratisthan & Ors.
vs.
Manager, Canara Bank & Ors.
Dated:March 7, 2017.
Citation: AIR 2017 SC 1303,(2017) 3 SCC 712
1. In these appeals a very short question has arisen, namely, whether a
complaint can be filed by a Trust under the provisions of the Consumer
Protection Act, 1986 (for short, ‘the Act’). The National Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, ‘National Commission’)
answered the question in the negative and we are in agreement with that
view.
2. Section 2 (c) of the Act provides for a complainant making a
complaint, inter alia, for an unfair trade practice or a restrictive trade
practice adopted by any trader or service provider; a complaint in respect of
goods (bought by a complainant) suffering from one or more defects; a
complaint of deficiency in services hired or availed of by a complainant and
so on. A complainant is defined in Section 2 (b) of the Act in the following
words :-
(b) "complainant" means −
(i) a consumer; or
(ii) any voluntary consumer association registered under the
Companies Act,1956 (1 of 1956) or under any other law for the
time being in force; or
(iii) the Central Government or any State Government; or
(iv) one or more consumers, where there are numerous consumers
having the same interest;
(v) in case of death of a consumer, his legal heir or representative ;
who or which makes a complaint;
3. It is quite clear from the above definition of a complainant that it
does not include a Trust. But does a Trust come within the definition of a
consumer?
A consumer has been defined in Section 2 (d) of the Act as follows :-
(d) "consumer" means any person who, −
(i) buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid or
promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of
deferred payment and includes any user of such goods other than the
person who buys such goods for consideration paid or promised or
partly paid or partly promised, or under any system of deferred
payment, when such use is made with the approval of such person,
but does not include a person who obtains such goods for resale or
for any commercial purpose; or
(ii) hires or avails of any services for a consideration which has been
paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any
system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such
services other than the person who hires or avails of the services for
consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or
under any system of deferred payment, when such services are
availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person; but does
not include a person who avails of such services of any commercial
purpose;
Explanation. − For the purposes of this clause, "commercial
purpose" does not include use by a person of goods bought and used
by him and services availed by him exclusively for the purposes of
earning his livelihood by means of self-employment;
4. A reading of the definition of the words ‘complaint’, ‘complainant’
and ‘consumer’ makes it clear that a Trust cannot invoke the provisions of
the Act in respect of any allegation on the basis of which a complaint could
be made. To put this beyond any doubt, the word ‘person’ has also been
defined in the Act and Section 2(m) thereof defines a person as follows :-
(m) "person" includes, −
(i) a firm whether registered or not;
(ii) a Hindu undivided family;
(iii) a co-operative society;
(iv) every other association of persons whether registered under the
Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or not
5. On a plain and simple reading of all the above provisions of the Act it
is clear that a Trust is not a person and therefore not a consumer.
Consequently, it cannot be a complainant and cannot file a consumer
dispute under the provisions of the Act.
6. In view of the above, we are of opinion that the National
Commission was quite right in holding that the complaint filed by the
appellant Trust was not maintainable.
7. We have heard submissions of learned counsel for the parties on the
merits of the dispute. However, since we have concluded that the complaint
itself was not maintainable, we refrain from making any comment on the
merits of the dispute.
8. The appeals are dismissed.
..……………………….J
(Madan B. Lokur)
New Delhi; .………………………J
March 7, 2017 (Prafulla C. Pant)
No comments:
Post a Comment