Supreme Court: The bench comprising of K.S. Radhakrishnan and Vikramajit
Sen, JJ in the present case discussed the power of CAG to audit books
of accounts of licensee service providers dealing in a public natural
resource of 'spectrum' and sharing the revenue with the Consolidated
Fund of India. They looked into the provisions of Section 16 of the
Comptroller and Auditor General’s (Duties, Powers and Conditions of
Service) Act, 1971 and Article 149 of the Constitution of India
in ruling that since the revenues of the service providers were shared
by the Consolidated Fund of India and that the resource in question is
one essential to the public at large, the argument that the CAG could
just audit a body under the 'State' or a body 'funded by the State'
could not stand. For similar reasons, the constitutional validity of
Rule 5 of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Rules, 2000, as
challenged in the present case, was also held invalid as the CAG was by
law required to keep a check on any and every transaction that affected
the funds of the State, irrespective of the Licensor's opinion on the
credibility of the records so presented. Therefore, the Court clearly
ruled that not only a special auditor appointed by the Department of
Telecommunication, but also the CAG, could at his discretion call for an
audit of the books of accounts of such service providers, at any
instant.
[Association of Unified Tele Services Providers vs. Union of India, Civil Appeal No. 4591 of 2014, decided on 17th April, 2014]
Print Page
[Association of Unified Tele Services Providers vs. Union of India, Civil Appeal No. 4591 of 2014, decided on 17th April, 2014]
No comments:
Post a Comment