41. In view of the above, we hold that for the purpose of
computing the period of limitation under Section 468 of the
Cr.P.C. the relevant date is the date of filing of the complaint
or the date of institution of prosecution and not the date on
which the Magistrate takes cognizance. We further hold that
Bharat Kale which is followed in Japani Sahoo lays
down the correct law. Krishna Pillai will have to be
restricted to its own facts and it is not the authority for
deciding the question as to what is the relevant date for the
purpose of computing the period of limitation under Section
468 of the Cr.P.C.1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.829 OF 2005
Mrs. Sarah Mathew … Appellant
Versus
The Institute of Cardio Vascular
Diseases by its Director
– Dr. K.M. Cherian & Ors. … Respondents
Decided on Dated;NOVEMBER 26, 2013.
Read full judgment here;https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5vWGtQ14k1BMnJEOVl1Wm9MTm8/edit?usp=sharing
No comments:
Post a Comment