The Commission holds that details of a passport are readily made
available by any individual in a number of instances, example to
travel agents, at airline counters, and whenever proof of residence
for telephone connections etc. is required. For this reason, disclosure
of details of a passport cannot be considered as causing unwarranted
invasion of the privacy of an individual and, therefore, is not
exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.
Central Information Commission
CIC/OK/A/2008/987/AD
Dated December 22, 2008
Name of the Appellant : Mr.Ansari Masud A.K
192-Kutbi Manzil, Flat No.10
CST Road, Kurla (W)
Mumbai 400 070
Name of Public Authority : The CPIO
Ministry of External Affairs
Regional Passport Office
Worli
Mumbai 400 025
Background
1. The RTI request was filed on 14.3.07. The Appellant requested for
information about the passport and other enclosures of passport of
one mr. Janu Pawar besides action taken on his complaint dated
28.4.08 . The CPIO replied on 13.5.08 denying the information under
Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. Dissatisfied with the reply, the
Appellant filed his first appeal on 5.6.08. The Appellate Authority
replied on 12.6.08 dismissing the appeal. The Appellant filed his
second appeal before the CIC on 24.7.08.
2. The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner,
scheduled the hearing on December 22, 2008
3. Mr.B.S.Rokade, Asst. Passport Officer and RPIO represented the Public
Authority.
4. The Appellant Mr.Ansari Masud A.K. was represented by Mr Mohd. Arif
Khan during the hearing. Decision
5. The Appellant’s representative submitted that he is not well versed
with the details of the case and was unable to respond to queries from
the Commission.
6. The Commission holds that details of a passport are readily made
available by any individual in a number of instances, example to
travel agents, at airline counters, and whenever proof of residence
for telephone connections etc. is required. For this reason, disclosure
of details of a passport cannot be considered as causing unwarranted
invasion of the privacy of an individual and, therefore, is not
exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.
7. After going through the arguments provided by the Appellant in his
appeal and convinced that disclosure of details of the passport is in
public interest, the Commission directs the PIO to provide the details
of passport of Mr. Janu Pawar to the Appellant as requested in his RTI
application within 15 days of receipt of this Order.
8. The appeal is disposed off.
(Annapurna Dixit)
Information Commissioner
Print Page
available by any individual in a number of instances, example to
travel agents, at airline counters, and whenever proof of residence
for telephone connections etc. is required. For this reason, disclosure
of details of a passport cannot be considered as causing unwarranted
invasion of the privacy of an individual and, therefore, is not
exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.
Central Information Commission
CIC/OK/A/2008/987/AD
Dated December 22, 2008
Name of the Appellant : Mr.Ansari Masud A.K
192-Kutbi Manzil, Flat No.10
CST Road, Kurla (W)
Mumbai 400 070
Name of Public Authority : The CPIO
Ministry of External Affairs
Regional Passport Office
Worli
Mumbai 400 025
Background
1. The RTI request was filed on 14.3.07. The Appellant requested for
information about the passport and other enclosures of passport of
one mr. Janu Pawar besides action taken on his complaint dated
28.4.08 . The CPIO replied on 13.5.08 denying the information under
Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. Dissatisfied with the reply, the
Appellant filed his first appeal on 5.6.08. The Appellate Authority
replied on 12.6.08 dismissing the appeal. The Appellant filed his
second appeal before the CIC on 24.7.08.
2. The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner,
scheduled the hearing on December 22, 2008
3. Mr.B.S.Rokade, Asst. Passport Officer and RPIO represented the Public
Authority.
4. The Appellant Mr.Ansari Masud A.K. was represented by Mr Mohd. Arif
Khan during the hearing. Decision
5. The Appellant’s representative submitted that he is not well versed
with the details of the case and was unable to respond to queries from
the Commission.
6. The Commission holds that details of a passport are readily made
available by any individual in a number of instances, example to
travel agents, at airline counters, and whenever proof of residence
for telephone connections etc. is required. For this reason, disclosure
of details of a passport cannot be considered as causing unwarranted
invasion of the privacy of an individual and, therefore, is not
exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.
7. After going through the arguments provided by the Appellant in his
appeal and convinced that disclosure of details of the passport is in
public interest, the Commission directs the PIO to provide the details
of passport of Mr. Janu Pawar to the Appellant as requested in his RTI
application within 15 days of receipt of this Order.
8. The appeal is disposed off.
(Annapurna Dixit)
Information Commissioner
No comments:
Post a Comment