Law Web: Important caselaws from Madras high court

Pages

▼

at 16:53

Karnataka HC: Notice To Accused under S.223 BNSS Can't Be Issued Before Recording Sworn Statement Of Complainant & Witness

The Magistrate while taking cognizance of an offence should have with him the statement on oath of the complainant and if any witnesses are ...
Supreme court: Defendant Can Cross-Examine Plaintiff Even If Suit Is Proceeding Ex-Parte Against Him & Written Statement Isn't Filed

On 1st July, 2002, the defendants applied for setting aside the order dated 3rd May, 2002 by which their defence was struck out. The applica...
Madras HC: It is not necessary to examine attesting witness to prove agreement of sale

If the revisions are allowed and the prayers are granted, the plaintiff will only prove that the signatures are of the attesting witnesses....
Kerala HC: Accused prosecuted before Sessions or Special court can file discharge application within sixty days from the date of supply of copies of documents.

But the crucial aspect is lack of clarity or legislative vacuum with regard to the starting point of sixty days to file discharge petiti...
Whether Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime act (Mcoca) will prevail over provisions of organized crime as mentioned in Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita as per S 5 of BNSS?

To determine whether the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOCA) will prevail over the provisions of organized crime as menti...

Powered by Blogger.